POLLEN UPDATE

So now we have two edits, two different misinterpreted narratives, of opposite effect.

One is too edited,

One is not edited enough,

Lets spark some middle ground,

The under edited one gives too much away, too much text is involved, 

whereas,

The overly edited is missing out on any intrigue of the book

But how to design a rule for middle ground?

Okay lets try a stricter edit without specified rules but with a stricter heart.
but lets try no punctuation,,

Therefore every part of extracted text must link to the takeover,
not to the pure mention of nature,
it must link directly to the takeover through the pollen,